| ▲ | swingboy 2 hours ago |
| It’s possible this could go before multiple judges who won’t all agree with this particular one. |
|
| ▲ | protocolture an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| Yeah but this was supposedly "Cut and dry" and no one familiar with the law could possibly mistake it, and it was all media manipulation that made it seem like there was a case where there wasnt one. |
|
| ▲ | goatlover 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| It's also possible the Trump admin has people commenting online. |
| |
| ▲ | bruce511 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | They don't need to be part of the administration. More than 50% of voters voted for Trump. Even today >30% (of everyone) think he's doing a good job. (Ie about equal to the voters in absolute number terms). Lots of people believe eat he is doing is legal simply because he is doing it. | | |
| ▲ | inigyou an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Well it is. They literally made a law saying whatever the president does is legal because he's the president. | |
| ▲ | jcranmer an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | > More than 50% of voters voted for Trump. Only 49.8% voted for Trump in the 2024 US election. |
|
|