100% agreed.

I consider Fable to be a super genius that was born yesterday and has memorized the internet, yet barely understands humans on a deep behavioral level.

By the end of a session, sometimes Fable and I are cooking incredibly, but then alas we have to start a fresh session. A lot of the intangibles about what are going well at that point are extremely difficult, if not impossible, to capture compactly in a “handoff” or “guidelines”.

The lived experience of working with me through the session, as represented in the current context, is what produces the higher quality results.

And likewise, the naivety it has as a newborn at the start of every session, along with the lack of deep human behavioral understanding, explains why these cutting edge models like Fable can still be so dumb in some ways while being mind-blowing in other ways.