Remix.run Logo
Flock CEO gets his house blurred out on Google Maps and Zillow(twitter.com)
151 points by lorecore 15 hours ago | 46 comments
gertburger 5 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Link is dead now

> This Post violated the X Rules

DrJokepu 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There’s something wrong with that guy. Quite apart from the gross privacy violation issues. Most of us didn’t even know what Flock was before the Superbowl and now there is this massive public controversy around it, and every time he opens his mouth he makes it worse. The board needs to replace him ASAP.

roosterIllusi0n 11 hours ago | parent [-]

Most companies are controlled by CEOs that are on the board and pay themselves a boatload of free stock. The CEOs make sure their exit requires paying them to leave.

water-data-dude 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I feel like setting up cameras pointed at the houses of influential people with public web feeds might help push some privacy reform.

frollogaston 13 hours ago | parent [-]

Or make all the Flock feeds public. Presently I have to assume all of these can and will be hacked by someone, or abused at a mass scale, so better not put them anywhere that could be a problem.

9 hours ago | parent [-]
[deleted]
darrylb42 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don't really understand how blurring out a house adds privacy. Looking around my neighborhood on Google street view I sometimes find houses that are blurred, now that otherwise normal looking house is now suspicious. Because I am physically close I can just look at the house if I wanted to. Someone "special" lives there.

schiffern 14 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I'm confused. If he has nothing to hide he has nothing to fear, right?

Seems like some Good Samaritan should set up a mobile pole camera (or twelve) outside his house 24/7. Rest easy, it's all being done for his own safety!

jordanb 14 hours ago | parent [-]

The guy gives me unhinged stalker vibes whenever he does an interview.

b3lvedere 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It does enhance curiosity. As an experiment i once requested Google Street view to blur my previous home. It really stands out being the only blurred house in the entire area. And i can’t undo it either :)

NewJazz 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

now that otherwise normal looking house is now suspicious

Mysterious? Yes. Suspicious? I wouldn't think that. Plenty of houses in my neighborhood are blurred. I don't think much about it. And yes, I can just walk over and look. But I'm their neighbor. Not someone megameters away...

everdrive 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

"Hey, this house between 101 Main st. and 105 st. is blurred, how will we ever find it?"

frollogaston 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You only know what the front of the house looks like.

ascorbic 14 hours ago | parent [-]

So does Street View

frollogaston 14 hours ago | parent [-]

Oh, turns out you can't blur the satellite images. Then yeah idk how this helps.

Edit: Well maybe you aren't a target to begin with, but mass scanning can make you one. Like if you park some expensive car out front and someone far away checks all houses with expensive cars. It's a bit far-fetched, but there also aren't that many reasons not to blur your house unless the concern is they only target blurred houses.

newspaper1 14 hours ago | parent [-]

> Oh, turns out you can't blur the satellite images.

You can if you're Israel:

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/google-blurring-satellite...

frollogaston 13 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

bastawhiz 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Didn't this man just go on record saying the public needs to "compromise" on privacy?

nxm 10 hours ago | parent [-]

public already does on multiple levels - it's just to what extent

higginsniggins 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Flock ceo attempts to stop people using online photo system from stocking him…

Hmmmm…

frollogaston 14 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Those images aren't publicly viewable like Google Maps, at least not easily.

atmavatar 13 hours ago | parent [-]

I'm not so sure about that.

See: https://www.independent.org/article/2026/01/14/flock-condor-...

    However, what Jordan found was a free-for-all, with less security than even what a standard Netflix account would require to watch a show. Not only could he access the live footage, but he could also review the video archives and even delete the recordings if desired.
There's also https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2025-59407

    The Flock Safety DetectionProcessing com.flocksafety.android.objects application 6.35.33 for Android (installed on Falcon and Sparrow License Plate Readers and Bravo Edge AI Compute Devices) bundles a Java Keystore (flock_rye.bks) along with its hardcoded password (flockhibiki17) in its code. The keystore contains a private key.
But that's hardly the only one. For a fuller picture, you may be interested in https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/search?keyword=flock&resultType=re...
frollogaston 13 hours ago | parent | next [-]

So who's at this intersection right now? https://maps.app.goo.gl/nQauinrTH3aYStk57

kayfox 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> flockhibiki17

I guess we now know what someone at Flock likes in their whiskey glass.

dessimus 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I mean, I wouldn't want to be boiled into a soup or stew either.

xvxvx 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Tells you all you need to know about Flock.

Freedom2 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

As someone who may or may not have a Flock (YC 2017) watching me as I type this, I'm glad that it exists. I can now feel "Flock Safe and Secure™", knowing that the compromise I've made has been worth it.

jasonriddle 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

https://twitterwebviewer.com/?tweet=2092993787605717176

Borborygymus 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I guess they must be doing something wrong.

deepc4life 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'd hope he did! I hope all of you do to. This isn't information you want so easily publicly available. It's a pretty easy request.

cheese_van 14 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It is an easy request. When the announcement blurring was made available, I made the request just to see if it they would do it - and they did!

Now, if anyone in the neighborhood asks me, "Why is your house blurred?" I reply, "Why are you asking? Is anyone asking questions about me? What did they look like?" (well, that's what I plan on replying if anyone asks)

everybodyknows 13 hours ago | parent [-]

It's easy? How please do we get Zillow to do that?

Zillow publishes, right now, interior shots of my house -- put up years ago for a sale listing. I have claimed the place as mine, but Zillow won't let me take them down.

Zillow allowed inserting new photos in the list, so I did: dozens of big wildlife photos. Considered a raging fire scene, or maybe a crack den, but then of course I might some day want to sell ...

14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
frollogaston 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah seeing this article was the reminder I needed to blur mine rn.

lorecore 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

And yet there’s no way to get yourself blurred in Flock videos.

jordanb 14 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The first key feature of the Panopticon is that the guards can observe the inmate at all times and he can't hide.

The second key feature is that the inmate can't observe the guards. He can't know who they are and can't even know if they're paying attention to him or not.

uberman 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes, an here in lies the hypocrisy of our times where tech titans can have their information removed from public data sources (anyone remember the guy tracking Musk's plane?) while amassing staggering quantities of data about everyone else. Then have the gall to call for a "compromise" on their collection and selling of this data and our privacy.

deepc4life 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

for now I guess we just need to wear blue man group outfits....

14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
spl757 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What a futile and stupid idea.

josefritzishere 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Privacy for me but not for thee

marksully 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

remember Barbra Streisand?

metalman 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

hope the rest of this guys life rhymes with "blurred out"

thrownaway561 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

People are so childish nowadays. The fact that things escalate to the point.

Micrococonut 14 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Indeed. This mass surveillance should have been stopped long ago.

newspaper1 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The Flock CEO just this week told the US public that it needs to "compromise" on their right to privacy. I'm glad things are escalating, we need every single one of these cameras taken down.