| ▲ | hombre_fatal 4 hours ago |
| It's pretty amazing what you can do when you embrace LLMs, figure out how to build one high-quality rigorous project with them, and then start working on more projects. You become a machine with your workflow, once again limited only by your time/energy, tokens, and your discretion on how to spend it. |
|
| ▲ | bitwize 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| It's 2026. Not using AI is deliberately hobbling yourself. You won't be able to produce as good code, nearly as fast. |
| |
| ▲ | bakugo 27 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | > You won't be able to produce as good code This says more about you than anything else. You weren't able to produce good code before AI, and you are not producing good code after AI. | |
| ▲ | VCFundedGenYer 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Using AI is cognitive surrender. It's not your code, it's not your work. | | |
| ▲ | onlyrealcuzzo 34 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Using typewriters is surrender! Not your handwriting, not your work! | | |
| ▲ | unknownfuture 8 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | If you can't see why your analogy is deeply broken I honestly don't know what to do for you. | |
| ▲ | some-guy 29 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I use AI all the time for coding, but a tool that non-deterministically reaches potentially a different output than I would have produced myself is not analogous to typewriters. | |
| ▲ | bakugo 27 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | I think it's pretty telling that the only response techbros have to that is some form of false equivalence, every single time. |
| |
| ▲ | 940273292020 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Using automated looms or wearing textiles woven by it is cognitive surrender. It's not your fabric, it's not your work. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | plastic-enjoyer 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > It's pretty amazing what you can do when you embrace LLMs, figure out how to build one high-quality rigorous project with them, and then start working on more projects. Indeed. But I think it's fair to say that just embracing LLMs is not enough. |
| |
