| ▲ | confusedbucket 7 hours ago |
| That confirms the recent spike of Claude calling everything I was recently working on a 'spike'. I still don't know what that term is supposed to represent (apparently). |
|
| ▲ | Kwpolska 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| In some software development methodologies, "spike" is a task whose goal is figuring something out instead of delivering shippable code. https://agiledictionary.com/209/spike/ |
| |
| ▲ | smj-edison 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | TIL that agile has its own words for everything. | |
| ▲ | Espressosaurus 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Why can't they call it a prototype or experiment? Sheesh. | | |
| ▲ | bloomca 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Prototype is usually something working, while spike can be pure research (e.g. validate that APIs are feasible and enough, or that something satisfies requirements). Prototype is usually more polished/usable. Experiment in my mind is something which user-facing but not in stable yet. So for me they are differentiated enough, but could be that I am just used to it. | | |
| ▲ | Espressosaurus 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | An experiment doesn’t say anything about user facing or not. I do tons of them when reverse engineering poorly documented hardware and APIs to determine if the thing I’m trying to do is even supported. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | xg15 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| A spike is an early prototype that you're supposed to throw away after having figured out the real design. I think it was subtly dissing you. |
| |
| ▲ | confusedbucket 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I think you are subtly dissing me :) I was half-joking, of course I could've just asked Claude, but the linked site shows there has been actual recent spikes in the use of the word 'spike'. The term does match what I was recently doing, but hacking around legacy ERP software, blackboxes and other enterprise abominations isn't that out of the ordinary for me. |
|