| ▲ | rayiner 5 hours ago | |
> You are arguing semantics Yeah, law is about semantics. And semantics reflects underlying politics. Immigration proponents never had the political capital to enact a law that actually reflects current practice. | ||
| ▲ | bubblethink 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
I just told you that AC21 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Competitiveness_in_th...), which is appropriately named, is a recent law that reflects current practice. | ||
| ▲ | mrguyorama 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
>Immigration proponents never had the political capital to enact a law that actually reflects current practice. Reagan, in 1986, signed a bill that legalized any illegal immigrant who came here before 1982 and 3 million people applied, of which 2.7 million were granted. This was a bipartisan bill. Democrats and Republicans worked together to do that. This was literally the bill that established the requirement that an employer cannot "knowingly" hire an illegal immigrant. There was zero enforcement from day one. Because the bill was pushed by agriculture groups. Reagan said, "The legalization provisions in this act will go far to improve the lives of a class of individuals who now must hide in the shadows, without access to many of the benefits of a free and open society. Very soon many of these men and women will be able to step into the sunlight and, ultimately, if they choose, they may become Americans." Go ahead and tell me recent democrat immigration policy, under "Obama the deporter in Chief, was somehow more lax than that. Than literally legalizing 3 million people with the stroke of a pen and a smile and doing nothing at all to actually implement the disincentives that would prevent future immigration. Reagan signed a law that made it illegal for hospitals to deny emergency care based on immigration status. The nation did not have any immigration law at all until after the civil war. Then we banned all chinese laborers for 30 years. What's funny, is that Reagan's amnesty happened after* Mexican immigration had gotten federal attention as a serious problem and we ran "Operation Wetback". That program is somewhat of an analogue to what Trump and ICE are doing right now, including the part about deporting legal citizens. Operation wetback was pushed for, again, by agricultural interests. | ||