Remix.run Logo
fg137 5 hours ago

Your first sentence is factually wrong.

I highly recommend that you refrain from commenting on any immigration related topics until you can get your facts correct.

Georgelemental 3 hours ago | parent [-]

https://www.uscis.gov/working-in-the-united-states/h-1b-spec...

> This nonimmigrant classification

https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/immigration/h1b

> The H-1B program applies to employers seeking to hire nonimmigrant aliens

afavour 2 hours ago | parent [-]

This is a nonsense debate, really. The H1B is a non-immigrant visa but it's also dual intent so it allows you to pursue immigrant status.

https://global.temple.edu/isss/faculty-staff-and-researchers...

> The doctrine of H-1B dual intent has the following legal bases:

> Unlike many nonimmigrant categories, I.N.A. § 101(a)(15)(H)(i) contains no requirement of proving there is a "residence in a foreign country which he has no intention of abandoning;"

> The H category is specifically excluded from the I.N.A. § 214(b)'s presumption of immigrant intent;

You say:

> You're not supposed to rely on it to build a life in the US with no backup plan

when in fact the visa very specifically allows it (as per the "no intention of abandoning"). People arriving in the US on an H1B visa with immigrant intent are absolutely following the law. Is it a good idea? Much more debatable. But they're not acting without precedent nor without specific legal text allowing it.

Georgelemental an hour ago | parent [-]

The "with no backup plan" is load-bearing*. You can pursue citizenship while on an H-1B, but there has never been a promise that the government will say yes.

*argh, why do LLMs have to ruin perfectly good words