> no-one cares anymore.

possibly because it took qualcomm buying them to make that happen.

Just say you don't know.

Mojo was partially open source before Qualcomm bought them, and they were going to do open source it anyway.

Was NVCC or CUDA ever open source since the lifetime of its development?

> they were going to do open source it anyway.

uh huh.

> Was NVCC or CUDA ever open source since the lifetime of its development?

you ever ask Nvidia why? i did.

	▲	rvz 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> uh huh. Exactly. You're one of those that don't care. Mojo's standard library was open sourced a year before the acquisition. > you ever ask Nvidia why? i did. The correct answer to my question is "No". CUDA or NVCC was never open sourced during its lifetime. Since you "claim" to have asked them and know the true reason why is not open source, just say what Nvidia told you verbatim right here. Intel and AMD have no problem open sourcing their GPU drivers for Linux, but Nvidia has a problem with that. We can only speculate that "open sourcing" it reveals their GPU trade secrets and their intellectual property for others to copy.