To paraphrase Andy Grove:

> The job of an executive is: to define and enforce culture and values for their whole organization, and to ratify good decisions.

(And that's the whole list! Nowhere do you find set tasks or make decisions)

To me, that means that they're still pretty essential - on both fronts, AI needs values and AI needs a system that can tell whether decisions are good or not.

▲

bronson 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> AI needs values and AI needs a system that can tell whether decisions are good or not

Well, so do most CEOs.

	▲	parineum 13 hours ago \| parent [-]
		There are hundreds of thousands of CEOs of companies you've never heard of.

▲

edoceo 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If the operation is to distill options into a few choices, and then pick the "best" one then, I think hivemind can win there too. Real-time democracy running a business.

For example an open-source project could/would still have a BDFL but, the AI-CEO could do the operational busywork while the BDFL is out talking to humans and presenting at PGCon or some other productive thing.

▲

jaggederest 13 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Nope! that's the subtlety. "distill options" is not the CEO's (or any executive's) job.

The way he phrases it, if I remember correctly (and this is by no means the only way to executive, I just really like his framing), is that the way you make decisions is by getting your immediate subordinates to agree, and they iterate. Decisions should be made at the lowest level that they can be made at, and if that's the CEO level, you've made mistakes.

So you make the values list, you make sure that people live by it (up to and including firing people who don't and hiring people who do, which he basically thinks is the whole day to day), and then you bring your subordinates together to agree on decisions. If they don't agree, you send them off to work through it together and come back with consensus (or, less great, compromise). If you have to put your thumb on the scale to get a good decision, again, you're not CEOing well.

Basically if you have to be a dictator, there's no way you can actually effectively do that. Proper leadership is getting people to act the way you would, if you had all the knowledge and perspective they do, but without having to make them do it. Lift them up, empower them, give them the responsibility and tools and values, and then endorse the result.

▲

vasco 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> Real-time democracy running a business

This is not a competitive advantage

▲

DoctorOetker 14 hours ago | parent [-]

Neither is dictatorship?

▲

jeezfrk 14 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Business actually treats a pseudo-dictatorship (with the requisite yes-men) as "good leadership".

Most times it's pretty simple, in my experience. A CEO either runs a business as a (1) Sales focus [best deals and vendors] or (2) Marketing focus [best reputation and trends] or (3) Investor focus [best boardroom friends].

Lots of other opinions are usually thrown out until there's really only one facet used for running the company.

	▲	vintermann 13 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Sure, if by business you mean investors.
	▲	kian 11 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		is there a (4) or (5) that would be preferable? :)

▲

parineum 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It is.

The best products are usually from single minds with a strong vision. "Too many cooks in the kitchen" is a phrase for a reason.

Your least favorite products are designed by committee or a vision less person following trends.

	▲	vintermann 13 hours ago \| parent [-]
		As long as investors believe this, it matters less if it's true or not.

▲

mrheosuper 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>AI needs a system that can tell whether decisions are good or not.

So they need someone to review AI output huh?

▲

m463 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[dead]

▲

dan_can_code 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Enforcing culture is not something I believe is possible. Nobody is going to listen to the C suite suit over their own experience with their colleagues. People just end up saying the right buzzwords to appear that the culture has been adopted, but it will be mostly met with malicious compliance. If the culture is driven by incentives and rewards for behaviour,then that's a whole different ball game.

	▲	snoman 11 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> Enforcing culture is not something I believe is possible. > … the culture is driven by incentives and rewards for behaviour… Not sure what your definition of enforcing is… but it doesn’t have to be by actual force.