Most of those accommodations are for macOS, and make very few (if any) concessions for alternative operating systems. We're talking Qualcomm-tier effort.

Intel and AMD set the standard for "tremendous effort" bringing up support for alternative OSes. Nvidia follows behind, and Apple's support is (somehow) behind Nvidia's foot-dragging.

▲

HDBaseT 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This is true, although Apple could of just as easily prevented alternative OSes as a whole if they wanted to.

	▲	Rohansi 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		They already have the ability to prevent alternative operating systems. They use the same or similar SoCs in their other product lines and those do not let you do this. Yes, Apple put effort into making it possible to install alternative operating systems on Macs, but that is an exception to the design because the chips are designed to be locked down. I expect Apple to remove the option at some point because nobody is using it on any of the recent hardware.

▲

LoganDark 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I see a lot of dual-purpose here. Maybe you don't, or maybe you figure it's just a coincidence that Linux can also benefit from this. Apple definitely had it in mind, and designed for it, even if they don't release documentation.