I think many people would consider 60fps to be a minimum and 30fps to be almost disorienting, even for casual games.

Gamers often go for 120-240Hz monitors even.

dietr1ch 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Last time I went to the movies I didn't have a good time watching "motion" at 24Hz on a large screen while used to watch motion at 240Hz on a small screen.

I felt I was looking at a powerpoint presentation or an animation made at the edge of a (paper) notebook.

▲

pxoe 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

40 fps could be a much more workable minimum, it looks quite smooth, wish it was more commonplace of a target instead of 30.

	▲	maccard an hour ago \| parent [-]
		40fps is probably 30fps with poor frame pacing. Most displays are 60Hz so there’s no benefit to being any non fraction of that, and you are likely to have issues with pacing if you are at a non standard frame rate.