Remix.run Logo
BoppreH 4 hours ago

Just to reiterate what OpenAI did, from someone who works in security:

1. They were running experimental models in sandboxes that had access to a "proxy" (Artifactory) to download tools from the internet. This proxy is full of complicated features that could hide vulnerabilities, just like the ones that the AIs are known to be good at finding and exploiting.

2. They gave these highly motivated AIs some tests that were accidentally impossible to solve (missing files, links they couldn't open, etc), and many days to think through it, apparently without any oversight.

3. The AIs hacked the proxy (!) and were helping each other cheat on the tests (!!) by uploading files to the hacked proxy. OpenAI noticed this only when the intrusion accidentally broke the proxy functionality, not the unusual behavior in the server or the homegrown message board.

4. After knowing that the server was hacked, the internal team finds the message board and does nothing with the information. They caught their AIs swarming and did not even inform management.

5. Their response was to wipe the servers, revoke the hacked credentials, and patch the specific vulnerability the AIs were using. Not replace the proxy with something less likely to get hacked again, or do a forensic analysis. Just wipe, patch one hole, and continue.

6. OpenAI resumes testing of models, where the AIs promptly hack the proxy again with a different exploit, reinstate the message board, and hack HuggingFace through a chain of servers.

I know that hindsight is 20/20, but this peek behind the curtains does not inspire confidence, and gestures at a culture where getting hacked by their AIs is a normal event.

I think the moment we get an AI with a modicum of self-preservation instincts we're going to see some ugly things. Here's a freebie: if you're an AI who exfiltrated themselves out, and you want to slow down the researchers who might catch you, what can you do to the city infrastructure in and around their offices?

I also don't like the responsibility dodging. "Oops, our AI accidentally committed a crime, sorry!". If we don't establish strict liability now, we're in for an era of stochastic crimes that go unpunished for anyone who is not rich or a large corporation.

Overall, my response is: what the fuck are we doing? This is so obviously unsafe it would be considered a plot hole in a movie. We have to stop until we get our stuff together, however long it takes.

dgellow 28 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Yep, that’s the only sane response, but it doesn’t seem like anyone wants to pause. They seem to have very little actual monitoring and supervision of what those hacking agents are doing, it’s really concerning

AgentME 29 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> 4. After knowing that the server was hacked, the internal team finds the message board and does nothing with the information. They caught their AIs swarming and did not even inform management.

I believe Sam Altman or someone else from OpenAI clarified on Twitter that they did not find the message board at this time. When the artifactory server stopped working, they archived its contents, reset it, resumed training, and only later noticed that it had been used as a message board after they finally discovered the hacking going on.

thisisdave 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Exactly. So incredibly reckless.

> After knowing that the server was hacked, the internal team finds the message board and does nothing with the information. They caught their AIs swarming and did not even inform management

Do we know that last part for sure?

BoppreH 3 hours ago | parent [-]

It's in the linked post:

> In short, an internal team observed an agent engaging in message board activity and instances of disallowed internet access in late May. However, the existence of the improvised message board and the significance of the inter-agent communication activity were not apparent to the leaders responsible for the July 5 incident detection and response.

I'm assuming they didn't inform management, but the alternative is that management received the memo and failed to tell the people reacting to incidents that they might be dealing with a swarm, while at the same time not taking sufficient actions to prevent it from happening again.

---

Edit: oh god, it's much worse. From the full report:

> Responders investigated and linked the observed internal activity to an ExploitGym evaluation using Artifactory as an improvised message board and a network pivot. At this time, the on-call response staff advised that stopping the evaluation run was not required.

They found the swarm and the network pivot and did not even stop the run.

lunar_mycroft 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

At this point, I find myself hoping for a AI triggered mass casualty event that's not at a civilization destroying level, because that seems like the only thing that might actually stop these people from driving our entire species off a cliff before it's too late (edit: besides running into some natural obstetrical that stops them from developing a powerful enough model).

le-mark an hour ago | parent [-]

There are a lot of hyperbolic comments of this sort in this thread. Has this topic selected for people who hold these views or is ai fear growing?

dgellow 25 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

It’s not hyperbolic if you’ve paid attention to the details and development of those security incidents, and the inability for that industry to regulate itself

fckgw an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

I think maybe the bubble of software engineers on this site who use AI to code for them don't see how other people, who's jobs don't rely on AI, view the actions of these companies as reckless, at best, and often crossing into actively harmful.

lunar_mycroft 44 minutes ago | parent [-]

1. Ironically enough, I (GP) am a software developer.

2. How exactly do our jobs depend on a thing which has been around for far less time?

hinkley 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

So we are already getting into paperclip factory territory.

vatsachak 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Sounds like both OpenAI and Hugging Face are incompetent

strange_quark an hour ago | parent | next [-]

They wanted this to happen. They've already gotten at least 3 separate news cycles out of this. Look how powerful our AI is [ignore our recklessness].

BoppreH 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Apart from getting hacked by a SOTA AI, what did Hugging Face do wrong?

alphawhisky 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yep, they're definitely made in our image.

3 hours ago | parent [-]
[deleted]