| ▲ | bel8 a day ago | |||||||
Source? GLM is great for coding and Gemini is barely useful in coding, to be generous. I highly suspect that the Gemini Google uses internally is very different from what they offer in Antigravity. | ||||||||
| ▲ | iamdelirium a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
No, it's the same internally and externally. Gemini 3.7 Flash is a pretty great model IMO. You shouldn't compare it to Opus, Sol, K3, etc since it's a much smaller model but it's a little better compared to Sonnet, Luna or Terra, etc. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | spijdar a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I can't speak for GLM as I haven't tested it much, but my experience with running DeepSeek V4 locally is the first time I prompted it with "Explain your capabilities to me", it responded that it was Gemini, a multi-modal model. I've seen others see the same with DSv4, as well as the "hallucinated" multi-modal nature. I would not be surprised if GLM similarly was partially (heavily?) distilled off of Gemini. A fun test would be to compare the logits for "gemini", "claude", etc for a continuation of "I am " on all these models. I'm sure that e.g. GLM, Qwen, DS are dominant, but I'd be curious to see the next highest contenders, and how they compare to each other. | ||||||||