[flagged]

totallygeeky 13 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If you can't understand the utility of having welcoming and creative/tenacious people involved in your science (which your questions listed are asking about) then you are not nearly the expert in qualifications you think you are.

▲

DataDive 13 hours ago | parent [-]

You misunderstood my reply completely.

I am saying we are not selecting for those people.

When we hire at the university, we ignore creative, tenacious people and instead select mediocre people with a nice woke story that meets the woke requirements.

▲

GetTheFacts 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

>When we hire at the university, we ignore creative, tenacious people and instead select mediocre people with a nice woke story that meets the woke requirements.

Which university? Name some "creative, tenacious people" who were rejected by said university.

There's nothing in your HN profile to out you to anyone, so have at it. If you are unwilling to do so, I call bullshit on your anecdote. Or as they say, "pix, or it didn't happen."

▲

totallygeeky 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I would encourage you to reflect on what you think "woke" is, and why things that you think are woke are mutually exclusive from the skills and qualities you value.

"Woke" is a nonsense scare phrase at this point, when what you're actually taking issue with is valuing people's lived experiences and backgrounds as a part of what they contribute. Understanding where people come from and how that colors their world view is simply a good practice when doing anything, but especially when you're trying to do science/academia. Too many similar minds in a room will never produce what one with a diverse group will. Diversity is good science, and valuing it is not "woke".

	▲	unselect5917 12 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Pretending the word doesn't mean anything is the most obvious sign that the person saying that is one of them. If you don't like the term given to your basket of political beliefs give one that encapsulates it that you like better. "MAGAts" is the obvious 'other side' parallel. Both sides have their crazies and denying that one exists means you're obviously one of them. As a Pacific Green I don't even like the fact that I can say "both" and people both know what I'm talking about and perpetuates the misguided notion that only two parties exist.

▲

FireBeyond 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I'm sure you can name this university, then. So we can compare the actual questions versus your weasel wordy, "basically" "like".