new | show | ask | jobs Github

claudeIsDown a day ago

On OpenRouter the pricing is: Input $0,075/M - Output $0,25/M - Cache Read $0,015 /M

How is the business model of Anthropic/OpenAI will sustain?

▲

vatsachak a day ago | parent | next [-]

I think anthropic is behind but Luna on a Jalapeno seems profitable

▲

dakolli a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They're obviously in a pickle, nobody is going to continue to pay $15-50 a mm tokens here soon. There's a reason OpenAI stopped training large models last week, and it's not because of "saftey" or "alignment" they know these gigantic models are not worth the squeeze.

▲

polski-g a day ago | parent | prev [-]

This is a bad model. Worse than Luna in every way; slower, dumber.

▲

pphysch a day ago | parent [-]

OAI/Anthropic shareholder? Speed and intelligence are not "every way". Cost is essential. Hence the Pareto boundary illustrated in TFA.

▲

polski-g a day ago | parent [-]

It literally cannot complete tasks that Luna can do easily. It doesn't matter how cheap it is.

	▲	freakynit a day ago \| parent [-]
		It actually can. I have been using it regularly for past 4 days. It is on sol-low level. I deliberately tested it on a moderately complex task. glm-5.3-flash one-shotted it correctly. Luna max couldn't achieve parity even after 3 total attempts. It was creating java bindings for this project: https://github.com/jeffhajewski/latticedb And here is the binding one-shotted by glm-5.3-flash: https://github.com/jeffhajewski/latticedb/pull/5