| ▲ | softwaredoug 8 hours ago | |
The Elon X layoffs are instructive in the difference between Twitter run as a public company vs as private (or buried in another company's balance sheet) In a public company, you need financial growth. You need 75% of employees to be developing towards a promising new future. In a private company, with no real growth goals, you can get by with 25% and keep things running and basically the same. You can argue whether Twitter's extra 75% actually was effective at driving growth the stock market likes, but its hard to argue against needing more staff to drive at least a perception that investments are happening in bold new product directions. | ||
| ▲ | HDThoreaun 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |
Twitter had 0 product growth for like a decade before elon tookover. If 75% of their staff was working on product growth it's hard to say they didnt deserve to be laid off. | ||