> No your choice was between a competent leader and a con man.

No, the non-con man option was an unpopular candidate who was installed after skipping a primary process. A primary process that was shown to be a complete joke during the previous cycle.

> When people type what you type it seems obvious you are attempting to avoid responsibility for choosing the con man.

I never chose the con man. Nor did I choose the party who manufactured consent for him with their pied piper "strategy" that was exposed only by wikileaks. Did the party reflect on this? No. They got mad at the person who leaked it.