The article sounds like AI slop with some predictable tells like short punctual sentences, bizarre jargon, and titles like "Recipe 4: On-The-Fly Embedding (The Fresh Data Play)"

Can we not reward junk like this? Most of the sentences are incomprehensible and provide zero actual argumentation, it's just a list of "whats" with no "whys"

▲

dsego 4 hours ago | parent [-]

You are right, now I noticed "Real talk" and "Why this is underrated" and I can't unsee it.

	▲	7734128 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		They're absolutely right – and this is is why it's a load bearing observation that cuts to the heart of the issue.