| ▲ | PinguTS 4 hours ago | |
What I am missing in all of those benchmarks, how does the M6 compares to the M5 Pro. I don't care how the M6 compares to the M1, even when the M6 2.3x compared to M1 in Excel spreadsheet. That is no measurement even in accounting. The dead time is not the Excel. I am to only one? | ||
| ▲ | rcarmo 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
The big difference you're not looking at is the memory bandwidth. The M5 Pro has nearly twice the one of the M6: 170GB/s memory bandwidth Configurable up to 32GB unified memory 307GB/s memory bandwidth Configurable up to 64GB unified memory That is also the factor you want to take into account for AI inference, of course. | ||
| ▲ | Zylokloto 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Last time the benchmark numbers from apple were stupid and they still are. I just wait for practical real live numbers with real stacks i use. And btw. they reduced the memory bandwdith on the M4 in comparision to its previous version by 40gb/sec or so, you need to wait to see. | ||
| ▲ | speedping 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
It basically means that every meaningful comparison produced an embarrassing improvement multiplier | ||
| ▲ | toasterlovin an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Upgraded my work machine from an M1 MBP to an M4 Mac Mini a couple of years ago. I do a lot of work in Excel with large sheets. The performance improvement was very noticeable and appreciated! | ||
| ▲ | zamadatix 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Benchmarks from the manufacturer are just marketing as well. Wait for independent 3rd party reviews. | ||
| ▲ | nicoburns 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/08/apple-introduces-m6-a... Says 1.2x for multithreaded and doesn't specify (I presume smaller) for single-threaded. That's compared to M5 not M5 Pro, so M5 Pro is likely significantly faster. | ||