Remix.run Logo
ramijames 15 hours ago

I'm 46. I've never had a credit card. I have a bank account and a debit card. If I can't afford something, I don't buy it.

You can just opt out of using credit cards.

gumby 14 hours ago | parent | next [-]

In the US you have several legal safeguards that are not provided by debit cards. Fraud liability limitations, chargebacks, and so on.

You can still implement “if I can’t afford something, I don’t buy it” with a cc. I pay mine off every month so it’s financially the same s a debit card but use a premium card for its purchase benefits.

elmer2 14 hours ago | parent [-]

I used to have this same mentality (no credit cards) when I was younger, until my debit card was stolen and someone took $1000. The bank basically shrugged their shoulders and said there was nothing they could do.

I always get my money back when this happens with a credit card purchase. I've also had to dispute things occasionally, and I almost always get refunded.

amiga386 12 hours ago | parent | next [-]

In an alternative universe, the government could require banks to refund victims of theft and fraud. It's entirely possible for banks to do this without requiring you use a credit card, they just don't want to.

https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-...

> Industry body, UK Finance, estimates that criminals successfully stole £1.28 billion through banking fraud and scams in 2025. Of this, £703 million was unauthorised and £576 million was authorised.

> Unauthorised fraud is where the fraudulent transaction is carried out by a third party, not the victim. Authorised fraud involves the victim being tricked into paying money into another account that is controlled by a criminal. This is also known as Authorised Push Payment (APP) fraud.

https://www.psr.org.uk/news-and-updates/latest-news/news/pay...

> Frontier found that APP fraud losses have fallen by an estimated £73 million per year and the number of APP scams have fallen by nearly 35,000 due to the policy. Reimbursement rates for all claims have risen from 54% to 65%, and for claims in-scope of the policy, firms are now reimbursing 97%.

gumby 10 hours ago | parent [-]

The origin of these protections in the US date back to the early decade of the general purpose credit cards. They started out for business expenses (the first one was branded “Diner’s Club”), but they were so profitable that the issuers wanted to branch out to consumers, but those were wary: many already had credit with their local merchants and didn’t see the point. (The local merchants offered credit bc women couldn’t have bank accounts).

Anyway, the credit card companies (Diner’s Club and Bank Americard, now Visa but still retaining the original color scheme and logo) lobbied Congress in the late 60s to get these protections enshrined in law so that consumers would get a benefit over using cash as a positive incentive to switch.

ryandrake 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yea, we never, ever use debit cards. Credit cards only, for the heightened consumer protections. It sucks that most banks and credit unions give you one by default that doubles as an ATM card. I always push back and ask if they offer an ATM card that does NOT have debit capability.

stetrain 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If you shop at places where many customers user credit cards, and those places don't change an extra credit card processing fee to customers, then you are effectively paying for those credit card fees whether or not you use one.

Opting out doesn't save you from those costs.

oefrha 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Try to pay for SaaS online. Tons of them accept nothing but credit cards; and then some of them accept direct withdrawals from bank account but it takes days to verify. Services using Stripe seems to be the worst at this. (I’ve never carried a credit card balance my whole life.)

timcobb 15 hours ago | parent [-]

Debit cards charge as credit cards no problem. That said not having a credit card is tough on your credit history. You could just have one and pay the balance but then they still have all your data, it sucks

oefrha 14 hours ago | parent [-]

I’ve specifically had debit card with Visa mark declined online where credit card was expected. Don’t know how common that is because one stops doing that once it happens a couple times.

7 hours ago | parent [-]
[deleted]
tomaskafka 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Whole Europe does this.

I never understood why whole nation wants to live in debt just to have one extra month of cash flow (which they’ll probably squander soon).

rsynnott 14 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This is arguably partly because the EU caps card interchange (at 0.3%, generally). So these reward schemes don’t exist, because there’s no money for them, so why would anyone use a credit card over a debit card or bank transfer unless they need the credit? Most people in the US presumably don’t start using credit cards thinking “I’ll get in debt, that’ll be great”; it’s the reward schemes.

rdschouw 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Ex-European here. It is very common to overdraft your bank account in Europe. The overdraft interest fees are very similar to the credit cards here in the US. It is basically the same service but with a different execution.

AnnikaL 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm American, and I don't use the extra cash flow (in fact, I make sure to keep more money in my checking account than I spend on the credit card, so I can always auto-pay my bill and therefore never pay any interest).

If I could get a debit card that gave me 2% cash back on all transactions, I'd use that instead!

freeone3000 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Because it gives me 2.5% cash back, which is basically free money.

wookmaster 10 hours ago | parent | next [-]

How do you think they got that 2.5% to "give back"?

ThePowerOfFuet 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That comes out of the merchant's pocket, who has priced it into the sale price you are paying.

It is not, thus, free money, at all.

recursivecaveat 9 hours ago | parent [-]

On a macro level, that's true. On an individual level, your avacados cost 3% more whether you use credit or debit, it's just your choice to recover 2.5% from that back in rewards or not.

amiga386 5 hours ago | parent [-]

It can also be your choice to lobby your government to shut down the rent-seeking behaviour of Visa and MasterCard.

It can be done. The UK and the EU capped fees at 0.3% for credit cards and 0.2% for debit cards

ricardobayes 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yet many European countries have high household debt. Switzerland, Sweden, Netherlands, Denmark, some of the highest in the world. I guess it has to be mortgages, since it's true they are not that "big" on credit cards. Although Klarna is a Swedish company.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_household...

hvb2 14 hours ago | parent [-]

Speaking for NL, yes it's mortgages. And those come with monthly payments towards the principal in pretty much all cases. Also, those being mortgages the rates are like 5% or so, not over 20%. Soll

After 30 years, people generally speaking own their home and that's their biggest chunk of wealth. So basically, yes a high debt to income ratio, but it's building towards wealth and its not high interest debt either.

nemomarx 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Pay your credit card balance off every week, and it's an overly complicated debit card but you technically build up a score for future loans. Also maybe you get cash back on that?

Rational if you want a mortgage in the US at least.

ramijames 15 hours ago | parent [-]

I'm in Boston. I'll never earn enough to buy property here. I'll never have a mortgage.

frantathefranta 15 hours ago | parent [-]

I'm in <other US city>. It's possible to earn enough to buy property here. I already have a mortgage (as an immigrant, building a credit score from credit cards which in turn qualifies you easily for a mortgage is pretty nice).

croon 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

While I hate that it's like this, you're leaving money on the table.

Currently you're keeping money in the bank accruing the bank interest to occasionally pay for stuff.

With a credit card you would get various bonuses/cashback/gameified returns by owing them money, and it costs you nothing as long as you pay them back once a month interest free.

If you however slip up/miss a payment it will cost you a lot.

Both cases suck, but the latter saves you money if you play that game.

That's from a EU perspective. From a US perspective you also require it from a credit score perspective, which EU thankfully hasn't adopted... yet.

Aefiam 15 hours ago | parent [-]

as far as I understand it, the creditcard rewards are from the creditcard fee, which is capped in the eu, so you are not missing out much.

croon 14 hours ago | parent [-]

Cashback is definitely capped, I'm less sure on other forms of rewards, but by my napkin comparisons, I do get out more "value" from my credit cards than the fees and cashback caps. YMMV of course.

amazingamazing 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Honorable but foolish. You could effectively get a discount and still use it the same way as your debit card.

ramijames 15 hours ago | parent [-]

Sorry, but I don't care what other people think. It's my money and I'm careful with it.

The entire credit card industry is set up to squeeze out as much profit from people as possible. They offer discounts as an incentive, but it is a huge trap that many, many people fall into. I'm not interested in risk. I'm interested in simplicity.

It's participating in the credit card industry that is foolish.

wildrhythms 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

For people who only spend what they have, what is the risk? I don't accrue credit card debt, never have, so I've enjoyed a 2-3% discount on my entire spending history. Over lifetime that will probably amount to a couple of vacations.

john_strinlai 14 hours ago | parent [-]

>For people who only spend what they have, what is the risk?

there is none. some people are just ideologically opposed to credit cards, like the parent appears to be.

their loss, really. they end up paying a portion of the cost but reap none of the benefits (rewards, additional legal protections)

rpdillon 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I completely get where you're coming from, but credit cards are a tool, and you can came out way ahead using them properly. For starters, they are key to having a good credit rating, which opens a lot of doors - maintain 3 open cards, pay off the full balance every month, and keep those accounts open for 10+ years. Big lift.

Second, never use a card with an annual fee.

Third, which I already said, but bears repeating: pay off the full balance every month.

Fourth, look out for one good rewards card and funnel expenses through it, so you can get the rewards.

My parents taught me all of this 40 years ago, and it was exceptional advice, and has served me (and my family) very well.

Credit cards are not about carrying debt. They are the worst tool for that.

phil21 9 hours ago | parent [-]

> way ahead

This is overselling it. You can come out 2% ahead or so. 4-5% if you are an extremely high spender who enjoys mentally managing 5 or 6 credit cards to max out category bonuses and other benefits and all that.

You come out marginally ahead at the expense of mental overhead. Good tradeoff for some, not for others.

I use a credit card, I dropped from 3-4 different cards trying to max out those 4-5% spending categories and just have a straight 2% cashback on everything card now. Plus one backup on a different payment network in case one goes down. It got to be exhausting trying to remember to manage so many cards plus remember to use the points, make sure to use the right card for the right thing, and all the other BS.

For some of my friends it's a hobby which is great for you if you enjoy such things! For me, it's just adding another chore to my life. Not worth the 1-2% or so marginal gain against my spending.

The super easy stuff is long gone these days too. You get far larger discounts paying via ACH for utility bills/cell phone bills/etc. vs. what credit card rewards give you so all the "autopilot" stuff is largely gone.

I do remember the days where we paid our Equinix bill via the company Amex. That was pretty fun while the party lasted!

Loggias 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

kotaKat 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I assume you've somehow gotten access to stable housing though via that bank account (possibly a home loan, or something else), or accessed a large line of credit before 'modern' credit scoring came into play (FICO scores and the Big Three).

I see many commercials for local banking up here that pulls out 30-40+ year members of the banks boasting about the prosperity the bank provided them, but at the same time, when they'd walked into the bank back in the day A Guy just said "yeah he's good for it" and wrote out the loans they needed.

You can't opt out of the modern credit scoring system and if you fuck it up even once with a bad line item you're out of the running for quite a few things and become virtually poor.

Lucasoato 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I’ll never understand this credit card debt thing... and why should businesses eat the credit card commission cost? Is it 5%? You pay for it, why should I?

sokoloff 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I’ve literally never bought anything with a debit card. I’ve definitely spent over a million dollars on credit cards in the last 3 decades and maybe over 2 million if you include personal and business card transactions.

That’s why businesses eat the credit card fees.

whaleofatw2022 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

5% is a pretty high rate IMO. When I worked at retail 20 years ago we got around 2 or 3%, and that was a mom and pop shop, not big retail...

KellyCriterion 14 hours ago | parent [-]

AMEX acceptance is super expensive, IIRC they are around on that level

quickthrowman 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Businesses accept less money when someone pays with BNPL. They also accept less money when someone pays with a credit card.

The reason is rather obvious, people spend more money with credit than they would’ve with cash. Accepting 95 cents on the dollar to get a sale with credit that you wouldn’t have got with cash still earns the seller money, money they wouldn’t have earned without accepting credit.

dboreham 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Vampire Squid. But this is only in one country. Go other places (e.g. New Zealand) and reality is different. There every single transaction has the credit card fee added explicitly.

tialaramex 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The reason for a business to want to accept cards is that some fraction of your customers would choose not to buy whatever it is you sell if not for the convenience. Whether that's a guy who decides not to buy donuts because then he won't have even to buy more scratch-offs or the woman who doesn't get those bald tires replaced because if she did the family will be leaving on cheese sandwiches until payday.

For the consumer the reason is that this is revolving credit. If you pay next month you can have stuff today. That's a small relief, unless it turns into a carried balance and then it's an ongoing burden, but you don't think about that burden at first because you're naturally optimistic.

nickjj 15 hours ago | parent [-]

> If you pay next month you can have stuff today.

There is value in this even if you always pay your full statement balance every month.

If you have a stable source of income knowing your credit card payment is due on the 7th of every month means you don't have to monitor your checking account's balance for every purchase. You only have to think "make sure you can cover $X by the 7th".