| |
| ▲ | jerlam 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I'm not sure that anyone in the management ladder is affected. People don't generally choose a fast food restaurant or convenience store based on the cleanliness of their parking lots, so sales isn't going to be affected. Nor is staff, already cut to minimal levels, going to be given additional hours to keep the parking lots clean. There even might be a disincentive to have garbage cans if they can't be maintained. People who don't litter will either take the extra step of going indoors, or they might leave it in their own car to throw out later. Whereas people who do litter will do so regardless of when there are trash cans. By removing outdoor trash cans, you've "saved" the staff the time to monitor and clear out those trash cans. | | |
| ▲ | ssl-3 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | If that's really your take on this then I have no option but to accept it. Let's move forward. What incentivized them to provide the trash cans to begin with, might you suppose? They aren't cheap to buy, or to maintain, or to keep emptied daily (or as they fill up, or whatever). But yet: They were things that existed, and their existence was definitely deliberate. What motivates companies that still provide outdoor trash cans to continue to do so? |
| |
| ▲ | xienze 41 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | > So move up the management ladder, if you will, until a party that is responsible for making this kind of decision is reached. That's the class of party of which I was speaking, and where I suggested that irrational decisions are being made. No matter what, big or small, it's always a Republican's fault, huh. |
|
