What's silly about it? Content-addressable decentralized storage -- not tied to a cryptocurrency -- is really valuable for censorship-resistant archiving of politically-sensitive data (such as climate change research).

▲

jazzyjackson 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Except it wasn’t censorship resistant at all, in that your node advertised itself as a node with a-z files on it. Separately you could put it behind a vpn or run a vps you paid for with monero, but fundamentally it’s more of a way just to pin a file to an address that works no matter what domain or IP the file is behind.

	▲	fc417fc802 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Censorship resistant in the same sense that bittorrent is, with no single centralized server or domain registration to target.

▲

muragekibicho 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It's the crypto aspect that's silly. Tech is cool IMO. However, the crypto adjacency makes it all look scammy tbh.

	▲	Grombobulous 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		In addition to that, this noble goal of being an insurance policy against censorship never played out. How hard would it be for a country to block the clients and browser extensions you need to use it in the first place? Or to develop a firewall technology that’s capable of blocking the traffic? Probably not that hard, especially since nobody uses IPFS for anything business critical since it’s not all that great at doing things that you need from file storage systems. Most reasons you store files somewhere benefit from not being decentralized. You usually want some combination of performance, security, durability, and availability. Decentralization is not generally a demand of file storage. The only reason it’s decentralized is because blockchain and crypto was hype 10 years ago.