| ▲ | ahussain 5 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
But isn't it only a matter of time before the AI generated autocomplete will contain the correct solution? What then? | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jgilias 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
For the completion to work, the source text needs to be ‘good’. That’s a basic kernel of how the thing works. Even with a perfect oracle autocomplete if the source text is ‘bullshit’, the output is too. Or, slightly changing this. The source text needs to speak the correct vocabulary and language to produce a good completion. See the chat where Terry Tao is doing maths with an LLM. There’s _no way in hell_ I could get to his output because I just have no idea, and can’t speak the language. Same with any field. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | gghkiuv 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
fucking is it? AI labs certainly want you to think so but they're running out of time and money. they've been telling me that the advancements of the last three months have made this a reality for the last five years. it's starting to feel a lot like Elon promising fully automated taxi services by next year... 11 years ago | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | organsnyder 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
So far, the LLMs I've used need problems to be fairly specifically scoped, or they don't produce the correct solution. Scoping problems correctly is a different skill-set than implementation, but it's still a technical skill that is expected from mid-level and higher engineers. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||