| ▲ | culi a day ago | |||||||
Agreed. It's been hard to watch how much vitriol was pointed at Mozilla for their reasonable position. The C++ decoder was simply unsafe and they would not implement it until a memory-safe decoder was available. Imagine if the fanatics got what they wanted immediately and then major vulnerabilities were introduced and there was a huge backlash against JXL. It could have set things back way more | ||||||||
| ▲ | eviks 5 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
> and then major vulnerabilities were introduced and there was a huge backlash against JXL. Has that ever stopped any of the previous unsafe stuff? Seems like this would be the same - we'd just see faster adoption of the better format without browser limits | ||||||||
| ||||||||