Selective enforcement is a tyranny generator.

How about the law doesn’t exist if it doesn’t actually make sense?

some_random 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Selective enforcement is just tyranny, but what I think they were getting at is a minimum size enshrined in law. I don't think it's a great idea, really highlights how arbitrary this all is and presents a risk of advantaging the worst actors more than real makers, but it's a valid way forward.

	▲	leros an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Laws like this are a good idea but its too burdensome for small companies so it cripples innovations and small businesses. Only applying it to larger companies let's it apply to only the companies who have the largest impact and also can afford compliance, while not stifling small businesses. Not perfect but I think it's a decent tradeoff.

▲

bluGill an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

The law makes sense, the details where things don't make sense