| ▲ | embedding-shape an hour ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> I just voiced my opinion. Same! I just happened to disagree with your opinion, and frankly, I'd say trying to gatekeep what people learn is closer to "borderline irresponsible" compared to asking people to build/learn/do X. > youngsters who'd be able to extract tremensous value from such an excercise But they're youngsters, who are about "extracting value"? Life is about fun, not extraction, not value, not avoiding waste of time but literally enjoy what you do, nothing is more important (IMO). Then who knows, doing fun stuff sometimes lead to useful stuff, like in my life. But if you only think about "extracting most value for time spent" or similar "optimization strategies", then you'd never discover this part of life. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | BoredomIsFun an hour ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Life is about fun, not extraction, not value, not avoiding waste of time but literally enjoy what you do, nothing is more important (IMO). This is, pardon, demagoguery. There is always "future fun" and "present fun" which a normal person would assign different nonzero weights (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discounted_utility). Besides, building a LLM _truly_ from the scratch, just using the famous 2017 paper and numpy manuals is not fun at all, esp. for a high schooler. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||