| ▲ | molf 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Why would you tell people that the correct order is to build foundational knowledge before exploring a subject? For some (many?) people, a 'proper' understanding develops _after_ the exploration. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | BoredomIsFun 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Why would you tell people that the correct order Because I can?. JK. Because that was my experience, of someone who is 2.5 older than 17? > For some (many?) people, a 'proper' understanding develops _after_ the exploration. I am afraid you have a too confrontational attitude here, but I'll answer anyway: because I do not believe you can simply "explore" such complex topics like building an LLMs. You'd simply be unable to build LLM drom scratch, unless you'd call cargo-cult chaining magic numpy incantations you've taken from Karpathy's tutorials "exploring". If I were in "exploratory" state of mins, I'd rather go from entirely different side - I'd try playing with LoRA-ing existing small LLMs, such as venerable 2 y.o. Mistral Nemo, to get "feeling" for what training is and how hyperameters influence the process. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||