| ▲ | Vim's UserGettingBored Autocmd(evanhahn.com) |
| 36 points by zdw 7 days ago | 9 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | hmokiguess a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| In some ways this reminds me of some cars that can detect when the driver needs a break. Wish it was a real thing, it’s easy to get lost in work sometimes. |
| |
|
| ▲ | olexsmir a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| there's also `:smile` (i think it's nvim only), `:help 42` |
| |
|
| ▲ | toxik a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| What an absolute AI slop post. |
| |
| ▲ | EvanHahn 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I wrote this entirely by hand. What makes it read like AI? | | |
| ▲ | iLemming 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | Ignore it. You have written a nice, pocket-size post - easily consumable within a minute. OC is just being a jerk, perhaps they are dyslexic or have problems with focus and concentration. Good post, interesting easter egg, thanks for going through the effort of writing and publishing it. |
| |
| ▲ | iLemming 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Can we collectively just stop doing this? This is never helping anyone, it just adds noise and increases frustration. After all, most technical posts are not prose, I can't ever imagine anyone reading them and honestly complaining that it doesn't read anything like Milton, Dickens or Dostoevsky. Style is a very subjective substance and telling anyone they should do something about it, is like asking someone to try to walk more gracefully. And when people do it dismissively, without any practical suggestions for improvement, it is enormously disingenuous and off-putting. What if an article indeed was generated? So what? Were you able to extract useful information? Was it accurate, false or controversial? Let's talk of substance, discuss content and if you can't fucking clench your butt through a few paragraphs of any text - written by a human or a machine, then just ignore it, discard it - close the tab, delete the file, erase it from your memory, forget and don't complain. |
|