| ▲ | bitexploder 3 hours ago |
| I kind of still chill out on Opus 4.6 too. 4.8 is good too. I go between them. Opus 4.8 is a little smarter some of the time. Their use of language is both very different from Opus 5. Some of the time I have a hard time believing Opus 5 is even related to Opus 4.6 and 4.8. |
|
| ▲ | Retr0id 2 hours ago | parent [-] |
| I'm going to be sad when they retire 4.6. It's not my daily driver but it's still my go-to when the other models are being stupid in one way or another (either being too verbose, or lecturing me about how what I'm asking for is evil and bad). |
| |
| ▲ | Melonai an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Hah! I was so surprised to get that "lecturing" behavior from Opus 5 too, I didn't know it was more common. | |
| ▲ | pertymcpert 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I tested all recent Opus versions and 4.6 and 4.7 were both fine FWIW. Seems 4.8 is when something started to go wrong. | | |
| ▲ | bitexploder an hour ago | parent [-] | | That seems about right. 4.8 is like in between 4.6 and 5 in terms of capability and language and they are all pretty close honestly. I just default to using Opus 5 for a coding agent that I don't interact with and I like driving with Opus 4.6 or Fable. Fable thinks too much though. Fable is like that engineer on your team that will over-engineer the shit out of something if you let them. Fable was like, "Here are 34 yaks, which shall we shave first <hands rubbing together>" and I was like can't we just... write the script first and then decide of any of these poor yaks need shaving? |
|
|