| ▲ | 0x457 an hour ago | ||||||||||||||||
Literally any coding agent marking material: - https://openai.com/index/introducing-the-codex-app/ - https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-3-7-sonnet anthropic specifically brags about how good claude code is every annoucement of a new model. I will surrender that none of them claim its "to perfection", but IMO its implied because no one would claim that their model one-shots any issue to dog shit quality. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | infinite_spin 42 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
- https://openai.com/index/introducing-the-codex-app/ no where does this document suggest that codex can "one shot everything to perfection with just a prompt". It describes using a prompt plus agent skills (which are essentially many other prompts) to develop a playable game.. nothing about it being perfect or anything more than being in a playable state. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hombre_fatal an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Seems like motte and bailey fallacy. They say their models are good (the motte), therefore their models must one-shot everything to perfection (the bailey). Besides, other people's claims about something doesn't give you license to abandon all critical thinking. Though it's evident they don't claim what you say they are. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||