| ▲ | gpjanik 2 hours ago | |
"When Moore’s Law slowed in the mid-2000s" it did not, in fact, slow down in the mid 2000s, or at all. https://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/moores-law-has-accu... | ||
| ▲ | jbstack 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
You've selectively quoted the article. The full quote (emphasis added): "When Moore’s Law slowed in the mid-2000s (specifically, single-threaded performance stagnated), we suddenly had to think about parallelization, architecture, memory locality, etc." Your link is talking about transistor count. The article is talking about single-threaded performance. Today's CPUs are faster in large part because they have more and more cores. | ||
| ▲ | sscaryterry 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
It did in terms of the traditional more MHz (GHz) is better, but as you've correctly pointed out, not when it comes to actual compute. | ||