Fable is still on the $100 plan for me. (Maybe this is A/B testing or something.)

rafaelmn 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Might as well not be - I routinely get rate limited in a single review session.

I've honestly stopped using CC and moved to codex. Sol has it's warts but I've never once hit limits on a 100€ and I get a similar level of performance for what I'm doing.

I wouldn't mind bumping Fable to 200$ plan if it was actually better but between the insane caps, reverting to opus/sonnet randomly and having similar perf as OAI - I'm done with it.

Next step is to put 100$ into open router and try some western hosted open models with Pi when OAI starts pulling up prices.

▲

almog 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

What do you mean by "review session"?

▲

alasdair_ 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You can turn off the reverting to opus with an option.

▲

rafaelmn 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I did not know that - but what happens then I get denied and I plead with the model that my usecase doesn't violate its TOS ? Edit prompt till I get it to pass ?

Reverting is annoying but being flagged for security questions while I'm doing code review is insane.

	▲	chrisgarand 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Yes, you get to re-try it until it might pass. Each attempt uses tokens at Fable level though. I once burned through a 4 hour window ($20 plan) in 4 attempts to re-frame the request. You want to disable "Switch models when a message is flagged"[1] [1] https://support.claude.com/en/articles/16049681-why-claude-s...

▲

bryan0 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah for me Fable works great on the $100 plan. The problem with Fable is you will hit the weekly limit. The $200 plan does not give you 4x or even 2x the weekly limit. For me i only get about 1.3x weekly quota, so I don’t think it’s worth it.

▲

giancarlostoro 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I still havent used it much, and they crippled Opus for what feels like no reason. Some suspect that Opus knowing theres a better model degrades it some. Shame.