Yes. I use Opus for tasks that Sonnet could probably handle, but I'm not hitting my quota. Whatever minor incremental gain is "worth it", since marginal cost is zero.

Even now, I use Fable as the planner and coordinator, with it farming out to agents. I don't hit my Fable limits either.

Which means I could accomplish more, but these are side projects so I don't need 30x productivity. Still, claude is constantly churning away at something.

▲

jml78 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I operate mostly in the devops arena. Lots of things opus is fine for. But there is just things where I can hand hold Opus through changes, or I can ask Fable to do it and it gets it right on the first try. People will say let fable plan and validate with opus doing the work. I found that burns fable tokens even faster because opus makes so many mistakes, fable has to review things 4-5 times before opus gets it right. A single fable implementation at medium or low effort would have one shot it.

	▲	ACCount37 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Yep. Every time you get more intelligence, that buys you more autonomy, more reliability, more task complexity. Tasks done with less mistakes, less handholding, less interventions. This is what the "good enough" people fail to grasp. There's no "good enough" - unless your tasks are genuinely small scope and will stay that way forever. If not, there are always more gains to extract.