[flagged]

I don't think everything has to be Thought Leadership. OP compared the same generation of models to show that the latest open model—at the time of the latest closed model—was Good Enough.

I agree that the opener to their reply wasn't productive, but neither is "Weak."

▲

dbreunig 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I think it’s a fine response when you say, “Doesn't feel well informed enough to give advice,” because I said 5.2

▲

hypfer 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Idk man, but an engineer would've taken that and said something like: "Damn, yeah, good point, I shall add a sentence mentioning 5.3"

Because an engineer feels secure in their knowledge so that such an oversight doesn't make them suddenly defend their identity - it's just an oversight after all. Happens.

▲

simonw 3 hours ago | parent [-]

5.3 isn't available as open weights yet, and only became available via API three days ago. Prior to that the only way to access it was via a Z.ai subscription.

▲

hypfer 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> Yes, weights aren't out yet, but neither are the ones of Fable.

Granted, edited in by me, but definitely before you - another thought leader - arrived.

he did already tell on himself btw. No point in this charade.

▲

dgellow 3 hours ago | parent [-]

FWIW you’re not looking good in this engagement, feels very childish, looking for a gotcha that doesn’t mean much

▲

hypfer 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I think that depends on the audience. Thank you for caring though :)

▲

kelnos 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Audience member here: I agree with GP; you posts come off as petty and childish.

It seems natural to me to make comparisons only to open weight models where the weights have actually been released.

	▲	hypfer 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Why would you also burn your reputation for this? Weird.