| ▲ | ninjagoo an hour ago | |
> It just protects free speech from corporations That description is a disservice. The real impact of it is that it equates money with speech for politics. | ||
| ▲ | deepsquirrelnet an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
One only needs to read Stevens' dissent in hindsight to recognize that all of his concerns were and are legitimate, and the worst of which have come to pass. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC#Dissent... | ||
| ▲ | darth_avocado an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Right, no one is debating the implications of the ruling and whether they are right or wrong. The parent comment was made within a specific context. We’d be here all day if we were to discuss citizens united. | ||