| ▲ | ghomst an hour ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Don't know what you're talking about, the article is good. Yes, they used ai, but this is what ai SHOULD be used for. AI should be used for either very small projects that nobody wants to do or very extreme missions that could take months. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | anonuser123 44 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It's the writing style of AI. It's quite problematic for a lot of people. I often really want to read articles, but the minute is encounter claude-speak, I (a) either leave (90%+ of the time) or (b) ask another AI to rewrite it using simple english or in a style of another writer in that space (yes, I know, it's ironical). Just hard to read AI-ism. The load bearing fact is it's not the content, or the originality, or the perceived lack of effort, it's reading the same trope for the 10000th time, and experiencing something akin to ad-blindness. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | feralsandwich 31 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The issue isn't with using AI for finding an exploit, it's with using an AI to write up the article for human consumption about it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | aprilthird2021 32 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The writing style was boring I also stopped reading halfway through esp after I read that a similar tablet had already been rooted in the past and documented online using the same exploit the AI successfully used | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||