| ▲ | Glyptodon 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I don't know about Claude specifically, but I think people are starting to internalize a sense of when prose reads as having "AI-smell" and I do agree phrases like "Same driver, same track. The LLM is the star." trigger it for me too. That said, that doesn't mean a ton about the whole thing - could be anything from humans starting to echo AI style to someone writing "give my results a headline summary" to an AI to someone saying "here's the data, write an article." | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | rdsubhas an hour ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AI is trained on human data. And high quality human data at it's best. Can we assume everything we think as AI - must have had a high-quality human pattern behind it, and there is no way to 100% prove which is which - unless the author shows a screencast of them typing the artice? This is not healthy. The right thing to do is – if someone doesn't like an article, they should ignore it – they shouldn't so confidently brand it AI without any proof at all, just because it fits their mood and style. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||