It’s astonishing how this relatively long article contains not a shred of actual evidence that any of this is true. It’s all “alleged”, “raised concerns”, “sources said” etc.

▲

orbital-decay 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Wikipedia's source policy makes it nearly impossible to refer to anything that is not in the media, and any sensitive article has to use weasel words like this. Are you just noting the issue with the article, or actually doubting that Kaspersky Labs is a de-facto FSB branch since at least 2015?

▲

atmosx 4 hours ago | parent [-]

FSB? Oh you mean Russian “Federal Security Service” ?

	▲	_joel 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It's been a while since I thought about Front Side Bus
	▲	jibal 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		As it says in the first line of the WP article: "Federal Security Service (FSB)"

▲

jibal 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The article is about a controversy involving allegations. There is plenty of evidence presented that the controversy and the allegations exist. (And if you dig into the links, there is plenty of evidence that the allegations are not without basis.)

> “sources said”

Yes, that's how Wikipedia works. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_vie...

▲

DaSHacka 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Welcome to Wikipedia