You are not missing too much.

One of the core features (MLO) is currently mostly scam. APs/Clients negotiate the protocol (and it shows up in the status) but doesn't it to either increase robustness or bandwidth (by combining/switching between two frequency bands).

Also the driver quality is a huge mess.

(We tested it using the latest generation Cisco Enterprise gear but also with Prosumer stuff like Ubiquiti or TP-Link)

But honestly: we need WiFi-8. It finally brings infrastructure-controlled roaming which is super important for any VoIP service.

▲

greenavocado 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> infrastructure-controlled roaming

802.11 r/k/v exists

	▲	BlackRabbit1 4 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		That's not controlled, seamless hand-over as we know it from GSM/3G/LTE/5G for 30 years now. We basically miss all data (received stations/signal levels from both sides, Bit Rate errors, etc.) for making roaming decisions and then to softly connect them to an AP you want them to be on. Enterprise WiFi is currently mostly "This is a list of APs you maybe can connect to.. have fun.. if you can connect we pre-seeded the AP with some crypto data, so it doesn't take ages to negotiate. Here's your (more or less friendly) disassoc. Fuck off bye." It does somehow work for stationary setups - but as soon as you have mobile traffic (like walking around or machines moving) with multiple APs the quality hits the shitter brutally. Currently this gap is being filled by industrial 5G with dedicated frequencies. It's crazy expensive.
	▲	avhception 5 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		On paper, yes. In the real world, that random Android client is clinging to an AP that can barely hear it while a better one would be available.

▲

LoganDark 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It sounds like you're talking about throughput aggregation, which indeed no device currently supports. Not even Apple's most recent devices have any sign of it, except that M5 Pro/Max MacBook Pro models are tested for simultaneous transmission on 2.4+5GHz and 2.4+6GHz: https://mrncciew.com/2026/03/17/macbook-pro-m5-wi-fi-7-missi...

▲

SweetSoftPillow 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> which indeed no device currently supports

Aren't devices with Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200/BE202 are supporting that?

As well as latest Samsung phones?

	▲	BlackRabbit1 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		AFAIR: the BE200/B202 only have one radio. So no parallel streams on two frequencies. But they are the best cards around if you want to play with Wifi-7 on Linux. But always go for the latest wireless-next kernel + firmware blobs. Also they are not compatible with AMD mainboards (go for Qualcomm then).

▲

gpt5 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

UniFi UDB-Switch has throughput aggregation for 5GHz + 6GHz.

▲

gib444 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

5GHz? Surely you mean 5000000kHz ;P