From what I've heard, Ollama has a bad reputation because it's a thin wrapper around llama.cpp without attributing it properly, thereby stealing recognition from the maintainers doing most of the work

▲

b112 an hour ago | parent [-]

It seems, and that seems is entirely my unvalidated impression, that Ollama lags in features, as they're integrating after the fact those changes. But (seriously) an LLM told me that, when some aspects of MoE models were better supported with the latest llama.

And it did in that case make a significant difference.

	▲	smcleod 6 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		It's very far behind llama.cpp, vLLM and SGLang in features yes. In part because of that but also due to some poor default settings it generally performs a lot worse as well.