| ▲ | pstuart 44 minutes ago | |||||||
Would you prefer gRPC, thrift, avro, etc... ? | ||||||||
| ▲ | amluto 30 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Those are mostly at a different layer. You can speak Thrift or Avro or Protobuf over stdio or HTTP or TCP or carrier pigeon. gRPC spans layers, and it uses HTTP in a more intrusive way than even MCP does — it expects to own the entire URL space at the IP/port in question. Using gRPC in a nontrivial way for MCP would be fairly heavy-weight: you would probably need to set up reflection and figure out how to bind all the MCP calls to it unless you just use it as a tunnel. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | jcmfernandes 25 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I would prefer a core transport agnostic protocol, and then see MCP-over-HTTP being a spec on top of that. | ||||||||