| ▲ | stronglikedan an hour ago | |
It's not an art piece, it's a writing piece. The illustration is just there for support, not the central focus or even the topic of the article. The author is obviously a decent writer, but I don't see how they should be expected to pay an artist for a simple illustration when this article has nothing to do with said illustration. Life isn't black and white, and you'd do yourself a favor by noticing the shades of gray. | ||
| ▲ | leni536 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
I don't think the illustration adds anything, it could simply be left out. I did enjoy the writing. | ||
| ▲ | odo1242 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
They don’t have to pay an artist for the illustration, just use a stock photo (lots of which exist). Or leave it blank (nobody needed an illustration). Having an AI image for filler seems to be in poor taste. | ||