Remix.run Logo
smellsfruity 6 hours ago

Why is it assumed that learning to cooking animals is a necessary hurdle?

When we’re capable of eating animals raw. And bugs and worms etc.

Whereas in order to consume a wider variety of plants, cooking and other more complex perpetrations are absolutely necessary.

conductr 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Have to consider meat digestion from a net calorie perspective. Eating raw meat is possible sure. But once you get to dense protein meats like a red meat, your body expends a lot of calories in the act of digesting it raw. Cooking it is like a pre-digestion step and allows your body to digest it with less energy expenditure.

It also probably was helpful for other reasons. You could store cooked meat easier/longer without refrigeration or kill off some of the bacteria and such making it healthier.

margalabargala 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Much like today, early humans were indeed capable of eating meat raw.

Also much like today, early humans did not do so if there was a way to cook it.

defrost 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If you're quite finished parroting RFK Jr pro-parasitic brain worm talking points not even aboriginal Australians ate their fish and meat raw.

* https://warndu.com/blogs/blog/traditional-aboriginal-food

smellsfruity 6 hours ago | parent [-]

And we know that because Australian Aborigines have a written history dating back 90,000 (or whatever the number is this week) years.

SamoyedFurFluff 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Actually yeah Australian aborigines have a famously rigorous oral history.

defrost 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Midden piles.

smellsfruity 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Which part of my first comment isn’t factually correct?

defrost 6 hours ago | parent [-]

The implication that because humans are "capable of eating animals raw" they therefore must do a lot of that (isolated idiots aside).