> would we be convinced that we have achieved AGI?

No.

AGI is impossible without a biological pineal gland. The pineal gland is the seat of consciousness and without one, any AI is merely a pattern matcher, not intelligent.

You seem saying:

(1) Consciousness is mandatory for intelligence.

(2) 'AGI' is no different than just 'intelligence'.

(3) Consciousness resides in pineal gland.

(4) Biology is mandatory for consciousness/AGI.

I cannot claim these to be wrong, however, have no reason to believe in any.

We do seem to agree though that the benchmark is incorrectly named.