For those who had access, how does it compare IRL with GLM 5.3 ? iirc both models are similar in terms of benchmarks ?

ganoushoreilly an hour ago | parent | next [-]

From a cost perspective Mythos is too expensive right now. With the right Harness and a few layers of models you can get close or better in some circumstances. Kimi / GLM, Qwen etc. And that's before ablation / Abliteration...

For those in Mythos.. if you ask how much it cost to assess their repos, your jaw would drop. We're talking the price of buying a couple machines to run Kimi / GLM full weight outright.. for one Scan.

Right now I wouldn't say GLM 5.3 is the same, but it's not far off. For the cost benefit it's the better of the two.

▲

conception 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I’ve been working on a decompilation project that fable was choking on and GLM 5.3 has been chunking away at it for 72 hours now? I think it’s my favorite agentic/implementer model right now.

	▲	ChickeNES 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Oh? Can you share any details on the decompilation project?
	▲	CamperBob2 an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		My big fear is that they are busy nerfing the weights for "safety" before releasing them. In fact, they've more-or-less said as much. I have a feeling what we are about to see on HuggingFace is not the GLM 5.3 that you're using now.