>I don’t think that would fly as a defense in court

but that's not the point, the point is to not wind up in court by presenting a phone that no long contains evidence but seems plausibly like your phone so doesn't arouse suspicion

▲

an hour ago | parent | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

dmitrygr an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

> by presenting a phone that no long contains evidence

Evidence Tampering

https://xkcd.com/1494/

▲

forgotmypasswor an hour ago | parent [-]

Yeah if they can catch you and prove it.

▲

MBCook an hour ago | parent [-]

Even if they can’t prove it, they can make your life really miserable for quite a while.

▲

forgotmypasswor 44 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

If it was implemented in such a way, there would be no reason to suspect anyone of using it because it would be totally indistinguishable from not having used it. At that point they have no grounds for legal action. Unless they could monitor FS/disk activity, but that goes beyond typical airport security stuff.

I'm imagining a duress code that erases select files and any indication that there was ever a duress code set up in the first place.

	▲	Capricorn2481 6 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		As soon as that starts, authorities will charge people just for having GrapheneOS. There are 0 checks and balances right now, it's a free for all.

▲

44 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]