| ▲ | malfist 2 days ago | |
What are you on about? This doesn't seem relevant to the post and the poster is certainly not in his 30s if they were a teen in 2000. | ||
| ▲ | yipinwong 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
Don't reply by just reading the title of the article. Read to the end. The author said "I thought retiring in my mid 30s after a few exits would be fun but". You never read the whole thing, thus don't get the context of the article. My comment will make sense if you read the full article. What a friggin troll.. I never mentioned anything about him being in his 30s but said he retired in his 30s... --- @TODO: Add "troll" in all my comments to research comment patterns later | ||
| ▲ | ssiddharth 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
I was 11 in 2000 which is why I said ‘as a teen in the 2000s’. :) | ||