| ▲ | miltonlost 2 hours ago | |
"Doing crimes, but a robot didn't mean to and you don't know its intent" is understating the evil acts. Soon a robot can commit a murder but nothing will be done because of your line of reasoning. | ||
| ▲ | TaLiTr 43 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
> Soon a robot can commit a murder but nothing will be done because of your line of reasoning. That's rather hyperbolic. Are you seriously suggesting in that situation the robot should be accused of murder? The robot's operator could be accused of murder, but it could just be negligence without intent. Because that does, and should matter to the law. | ||
| ▲ | john_strinlai 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
it's not my line of reasoning, i didn't invent it. it's how the law currently works. intent is the crucial factor in CFAA cases. maybe that changes down the road as a result of llm's and increasing frequency of similar cases. that has not happened yet. | ||