| ▲ | atomicnumber3 5 hours ago | |
It's because the messaging for what the point of these things is supposed to be is all over the place. Ask 10 different people and you'll get 10 different answers: - A superintelligence that will usher in an age of human enlightenment - A superintelligence that will usher in an age of human enslavement - A really cool way to rake in trillion of rich VC/investor money by promising you're building a superintelligence that will usher in an age of human en[slave/lighten]ment - A transformer model for predicting output tokens given a series of input tokens, informed primarily by reddit, stack overflow, and 6000 years of classical literature. - A replacement for white collar labor. Start now or join the permanent underclass. - A convenient fuzzy-find tool also capable of some probably-correct code generation. - The ultimate customizable text RPG experience (you can pick if G stand for game or...) And so on. So, some people see a new model and check for how close humanity is to enslavement. Some people check to see if it got better at fixing broken unit tests. | ||
| ▲ | KerrAvon 5 hours ago | parent [-] | |
What's amazing is that all of these are true at once. If you allow for some significant slack in what "superintelligence" means. | ||