> Now I’m certain they’re not chopping up Davincis notebooks, but I’m not certain there aren’t some that would make people wince.

Then they should list the names of these books otherwise I say they're alarmist.

If they have, I haven’t seen it.

It’s very possible I’ve just missed deeper reporting, obviously.

But otherwise I agree. I’m neither losing sleep over it or just trusting that these (historically kinda scummy) businesses are actually behaving.

If there’s a serious problem I’d like to see something more concrete. Same for hand-waving the question.